Author
Abstract
PurposeThe negative distress–return relationship has been documented not only in the U.S. but also in China, posing a puzzling challenge for financial economics research. This paper aims to provide a behavioral explanation for the distress puzzle in China.Design/methodology/approachThe data sample includes more than 4,700 A-shares listed on the Shenzhen and Shanghai stock exchanges from 2005 to 2025. Distress risk is measured by the distance-to-default of Merton (1974) or the Z″-score of Altman et al. (2017). Stock mispricing is measured based on the decomposition framework proposed by Rhodes-Kropf et al. (2005). To examine the effect of mispricing on the distress risk anomaly, we perform double-sort analyses, asset pricing models and Fama–MacBeth cross-sectional regressions.FindingsWe document a distress risk anomaly in China, whereby average stock returns systematically increase as distress risk declines, regardless of the risk proxy. In the double-sort analysis, the distress risk premium disappears in the undervalued group, whereas it becomes more robust in the overvalued group. The anomalous distress–return relationship is also insignificant after controlling for mispricing in asset pricing models and Fama–MacBeth regressions. Therefore, stock mispricing provides a compelling explanation for the distress risk puzzle in China.Originality/valueThe paper is the first to examine the effect of mispricing on the anomalous distress–return relationship in China, the second-largest market with unique characteristics. We also contribute to the asset pricing literature by constructing a mispricing factor for the Chinese stock market. Our findings have several essential implications for both investors and policymakers. Investors seeking abnormal returns from default-risk strategies should focus on undervalued distressed stocks and incorporate mispricing factors into asset pricing models. Chinese policymakers should develop effective policies to strengthen institutional investor participation and reduce market frictions.
Suggested Citation
Le Quy Duong, 2026.
"The distress risk puzzle in China: a mispricing explanation,"
Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(6), pages 590-609, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-02-2026-0072
DOI: 10.1108/RBF-02-2026-0072
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-02-2026-0072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.