IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rbfpps/rbf-01-2026-0029.html

From financial news to investor emotions: predicting stock movement in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Raza
  • Mahnoor Altaf

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine whether investor emotions embedded in financial news can predict next-day (t+1) stock market movements in Pakistan. Specifically, it assesses whether incorporating emotion-based indicators, operationalized using the NRC Emotion Lexicon (v0.92), which maps tokenized words to eight primary emotions, into deep learning models improves the accuracy of stock price forecasts for the KSE-100 index on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).Design/methodology/approachFinancial news articles published between January 2013 and August 2025 were collected from five leading Pakistani English-language news outlets. Investor emotions were quantified by applying the NRC Emotion Lexicon to preprocessed article text, producing normalized emotion scores for eight categories (anger, anticipation, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise and trust) at the article level. These scores were aggregated into daily emotion indices and integrated with historical stock market data as input features for four deep learning architectures: long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, deep neural networks (DNN), convolutional neural networks (CNN) and gated recurrent units (GRU). Model performance was evaluated across multiple forecast horizons (t+1, t+20, and t+50 days) using a rolling-window validation approach, with mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) as the primary evaluation metrics. Granger causality tests were additionally employed to investigate the causal ordering between emotion indices and stock returns.FindingsThe results reveal a dominance of negative emotions in financial news, with fear and sadness exerting a significant influence on adverse market movements. Emotion-augmented models outperform baseline models that rely solely on historical price data, with LSTM achieving the highest predictive accuracy (MAPE = 1.58%) at the t+1 horizon. Rolling window validation confirms model robustness across different market regimes. Granger causality tests reveal that disgust, sadness and joy significantly Granger-cause stock returns, while returns in turn Granger-cause anticipation and disgust, indicating bidirectional feedback loops. These findings constitute evidence against the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) in the Pakistani market.Originality/valueThis study contributes novel evidence from Pakistan's emerging market by integrating emotion-level (rather than binary positive/negative) sentiment measures with deep learning models for stock prediction. It provides the first systematic test of whether emotion signals in financial news predict stock returns on the PSX, offering evidence on the semi-strong-form efficiency of the Pakistani equity market. The multi-horizon and rolling window evaluation framework offers methodological improvements over prior single-split approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Raza & Mahnoor Altaf, 2026. "From financial news to investor emotions: predicting stock movement in Pakistan," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(6), pages 569-589, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-01-2026-0029
    DOI: 10.1108/RBF-01-2026-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/rbf/article/18/6/569/1391998/From-financial-news-to-investor-emotions
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/rbf/article-pdf/18/6/569/11791128/rbf-01-2026-0029en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RBF-01-2026-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-01-2026-0029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.