IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rauspp/rausp-06-2025-0108.html

Psychological predictors of unhealthy eating and food security: a meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Juliano Domingues da Silva
  • Valéria Abucarma Coplas Maximiano
  • João Otávio Montanha Endrici
  • Nayara Pelegrinello Panage
  • Fernanda Cristina Ferro Malacoski

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigates how national food security moderates the predictive relationships proposed by the theory of planned behavior (TPB) – attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control (PBC) – in the context of unhealthy food consumption.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a meta-analysis of 75 studies, encompassing 427 effect sizes related to intention and behavior regarding unhealthy eating. The authors used random-effects models and meta-regressions to test the moderating role of the Global Food Security Index (GFSI), along with covariates such as sample nature, measurement strategy, behavioral framing and sample age.FindingsAll TPB constructs showed significant positive associations with unhealthy eating. However, GFSI significantly moderated these effects. Higher national food security levels weakened the relationships between attitudes, subjective norms, PBC and unhealthy food consumption. This suggests that in more food-secure environments, psychological predictors play a less central role in dietary decision-making.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings advance TPB by demonstrating its conditional validity under different macrostructural conditions, reinforcing the integration of ecological and structural variables in behavioral models.Practical implicationsIn food-secure contexts, public health interventions may benefit more from structural strategies than cognitive or motivational approaches. Conversely, in food-insecure settings, targeting attitudes and perceived control remains relevant.Social implicationsTailoring health campaigns to food security contexts can increase effectiveness and support more equitable, sustainable food systems.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to integrate TPB with national food security indicators, offering novel insights into how environmental structure shapes health behavior predictors in unhealthy eating.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliano Domingues da Silva & Valéria Abucarma Coplas Maximiano & João Otávio Montanha Endrici & Nayara Pelegrinello Panage & Fernanda Cristina Ferro Malacoski, 2026. "Psychological predictors of unhealthy eating and food security: a meta-analysis," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61, pages 176-191, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rauspp:rausp-06-2025-0108
    DOI: 10.1108/RAUSP-06-2025-0108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/rausp/article/doi/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2025-0108/1400094/Psychological-predictors-of-unhealthy-eating-and
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/rausp/article-pdf/doi/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2025-0108/11888613/rausp-06-2025-0108en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2025-0108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rauspp:rausp-06-2025-0108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.