Author
Listed:
- Kam C. Chan
- Picheng Lee
- Gim S. Seow
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the rationale for the failure of management and auditors to identify material internal control weaknesses (ICWs) in their initial Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) 404 reviews, resulting in subsequent restatement of their opinions. Design/methodology/approach - The paper focuses on the factors associated with the failure of management and auditor to identify material internal controls weaknesses in their initial SOX 404 reports. Logistic regression is run on a sample of 56 firms that reported material internal controls weaknesses in their amended internal control reports and a control group of 344 firms that reported material internal controls weaknesses (i.e. ineffective internal controls) in their initial internal control reports for 2004. Findings - The results show that firm size, the use of a Big 4 auditor, the ratio of non‐audit to total fees, and the need for accounting restatements are positively associated with the probability to file an amended internal control report. The number of ICWs and the number of audit committee meetings are negatively associated with the probability to file an amended internal control report. Practical implications - The paper's findings suggest that regulators and corporate boards should consider providing more guidelines on audit committee practices in addition to the audit committee structure. For example, more guidance by the board is needed to ensure that the audit committee is active in overseeing the company's auditor–client relationship and its internal audit function. Originality/value - Empirical findings on factors associated with the failure of management and auditor to identify material ICWs in their SOX 404 review can contribute to an understanding of factors affecting the efficiency of the SOX 404 review by attributing such failure to either inherent factors such as operational complexity and industry membership or to managerial choices in auditor‐client relationship and corporate governance issues. An understanding of these factors can help companies and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission in their efforts to improve the effectiveness and the efficiency of the current SOX 404 process.
Suggested Citation
Kam C. Chan & Picheng Lee & Gim S. Seow, 2008.
"Why did management and auditors fail to identify ineffective internal controls in their initial SOX 404 reviews?,"
Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 338-354, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:7:y:2008:i:4:p:338-354
DOI: 10.1108/14757700810920757
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Bruynseels, L.M.L. & Cardinaels, E., 2014.
"The audit committee : Management watchdog or personal friend of the CEO?,"
Other publications TiSEM
4efbab67-3b44-4eab-9f17-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Kam C. Chan & Rudolph A. Jacob & Picheng Lee & Gim S. Seow, 2012.
"The effects of Section 404 of Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 on the audit fees of foreign firms listed on US exchanges,"
Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 236-256, August.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:7:y:2008:i:4:p:338-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.