Author
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to examine the relationship between the disclosure motivations derived from product and capital markets and segment information in Japanese firms. While the product market would motivate firms to adjust their disclosure to expected competitors’ reactions, the capital market would promote them to reduce information asymmetry through market discipline and corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach - The segment data is manually collected from annual reports. Product market motivation is measured by the level of potential and existing competition. Capital market motivation is categorized into market discipline and corporate governance, primarily represented by foreign investors and stock-based compensation, respectively. After the cross-sectional baseline analysis, interaction terms between the two markets are added. Findings - Product market motivation presents different effects on segment disclosure conditional on competition types. Notably, the level of potential competition is positively (negatively) linked with disclosure quality (quantity). Regarding capital market motivation, stock-based compensation negatively moderates the association between product market competition and voluntary disclosure quantity, suggesting that the compensation promotes hiding information when disclosure incurs higher proprietary costs. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature in twofolds. First, the findings partially support the theoretical model suggesting the contrasting effects of the different types of competition on disclosure. This paper supplements Karuna (2023) with comprehensive disclosure variables. Nevertheless, the results are substantially specification-sensitive. Second, this paper examines an underexplored governance measure: stock-based compensation. The moderation analyses show novel evidence of its deterring effect on segment disclosure, complementing Enache and Kim (2020).
Suggested Citation
Yuriko Takahashi, 2025.
"How do the product and capital markets relate to segment disclosure?: Evidence from Japan,"
Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 339-369, April.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:parpps:par-08-2024-0169
DOI: 10.1108/PAR-08-2024-0169
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:parpps:par-08-2024-0169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.