Author
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to examine factors that determine the time lapse between audit report date and resignation date (the resignation lag). As supporting tests, it also studies auditor resignation and client risk portfolio of the resigning auditor. Design/methodology/approach - This paper uses a high-profile case in Hong Kong and a logistic regression to study resignation lag, an ordinary least squares regression to examine auditor resignation, andt-tests and chi-square tests to investigate the risk portfolio of clients dropped, retained and taken-up by the auditor. Findings - This paper reports that resignation lag is shorter for clients listed on the main board, with a reported loss or high leverage. The results of a reported loss and high leverage indicate that riskier clients are dropped sooner by the auditor. It also finds that more risky clients are dropped by the auditor and less likely taken up by other Big 4 auditors, and dropped clients become riskier after being dropped. In addition, new clients are not more risky than continuing clients but less risky than clients dropped. Research limitations/implications - Since client risk could not be measured by a single risk variable, the conclusion of the results depends on the totality of the results of all variables used. Generalisation of the results should be done cautiously due to the small sample size. As the literature lacks a model that explains resignation lag, the results could be different had such a model exists. Originality/value - The investigation of resignation lag advances the literature because it is in the interest of auditors to drop more unfavourable engagements sooner. This efficiency issue, absent in prior studies, is important to an understanding of the audit market. In addition, resignation lag could serve as an observable, summary measure of the resigning auditors’ assessment of client risk, and participants in the market could infer the riskiness of dropped clients using resignation lag.
Suggested Citation
Kam-Wah Lai, 2025.
"How quickly do auditors resign from engagements: an examination of auditor resignation lag,"
Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 299-320, April.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:parpps:par-06-2024-0118
DOI: 10.1108/PAR-06-2024-0118
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:parpps:par-06-2024-0118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.