IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/nbripp/v1y2010i1p100-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The research on the roles and responsibilities of boards in nonprofit organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Hongpeng Liu

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the actual status of roles and responsibilities of boards in nonprofit organizations in China by comparative analysis and through setting the USA as a frame of reference. Design/methodology/approach - Five roles and responsibilities are compared between Chinese and American nonprofits. Among Chinese nonprofits, foundations and associations are compared. Both primary and secondary data are used. Findings - On the roles and responsibilities of nonprofit boards, developed countries such as the USA are more active than China. Within China, boards of foundations are more active than the boards of associations. Research limitations/implications - Small sampling limits universality and applicability of this paper's conclusions. Every sort of role and responsibility are not further divided. Originality/value - This paper examines the extent to which boards fulfill roles and responsibilities, and provides reference effects for further researches and for improvement of board governance of nonprofits in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongpeng Liu, 2010. "The research on the roles and responsibilities of boards in nonprofit organizations," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 100-117, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:nbripp:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:100-117
    DOI: 10.1108/20408741011032881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/20408741011032881/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/20408741011032881/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/20408741011032881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:nbripp:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:100-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.