Author
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to optimize strategic decisions and profit distribution among members of the power battery closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), considering both competition and cooperation dynamics.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs the noncooperative-cooperative biform game approach to examine strategy optimization and profit distribution among CLSC members for electric vehicle (EV) power batteries. The model integrates manufacturers’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) considerations and competitive recycling dynamics between recyclers and echelon utilization enterprises. Numerical simulations are employed to evaluate how key parameters influence optimal decisions and profit distribution.FindingsExcessive competition in recycling reduces the supply chain’s operational efficiency and negatively affects profits. Recyclers and echelon utilization enterprises should reduce competitive pressures. Higher echelon utilization rates improve supply chain efficiency and promote retired battery recycling. Manufacturers and echelon utilization firms should prioritize investments in utilization technologies and operational productivity. Furthermore, optimizing input costs while balancing CSR investments can enhance mutual benefits among supply chain members.Originality/valueThis paper applies the noncooperative-cooperative biform game to advance theoretical research on power battery CLSC, investigating the interplay between cooperation and competition among supply chain members. The study provides managerial insights for optimizing recycling competition and CSR investment strategies, offering practical value for coordinating stakeholder interests in the power battery CLSC with echelon utilization.
Suggested Citation
Kuiyang Hu & Qiang Hou, 2025.
"Decision-making of power battery closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility and echelon utilization,"
Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 346-371, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:mscrap:mscra-11-2024-0047
DOI: 10.1108/MSCRA-11-2024-0047
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mscrap:mscra-11-2024-0047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.