Author
Listed:
- Hayford Pittri
- Godawatte Arachchige Gimhan Rathnagee Godawatte
- Alan Mark Forster
Abstract
Purpose Blockchain technology (BT) has attracted growing attention in construction supply chain management (CSCM), yet existing research predominantly emphasises applications, technical architectures and barriers, providing limited understanding of the pressures motivating adoption. This study, therefore, systematically identifies and synthesises the drivers of BT adoption in construction supply chains (CSCs).Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review, conducted using the Scopus database, yielded 493 records. Following screening, 145 publications were retained for scientometric analysis, with 40 subsequently selected for qualitative content analysis.Findings The findings identify five interrelated driver themes: information governance; transactional and operational pressures; digital integration; sustainability and institutional pressures; and strategic and contextual pressures. Information fragmentation, limited visibility, trust and accountability deficits, coordination inefficiencies and unreliable provenance emerged as the most prominent motivations. However, driver salience varies across clients, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, regulators and other supply-chain actors, demonstrating that adoption is a negotiated network-level decision rather than a uniform organisational response.Originality/value The findings provide a theoretically grounded basis for empirical research and help practitioners and policymakers align BT investments, governance arrangements and procurement interventions with clearly defined supply-chain problems rather than technology-led experimentation.
Suggested Citation
Hayford Pittri & Godawatte Arachchige Gimhan Rathnagee Godawatte & Alan Mark Forster, 2026.
"Drivers of blockchain technology adoption in construction supply chains: a systematic literature review and scientometric synthesis,"
Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pages 1-25, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:mscrap:mscra-04-2026-0049
DOI: 10.1108/MSCRA-04-2026-0049
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:mscrap:mscra-04-2026-0049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.