IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/medarp/v21y2013i1p52-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of internal organisational factors on corporate‐community partnership agendas

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Glennie
  • Sumit Lodhia

Abstract

Purpose - Corporate‐community partnerships, the collaboration between business and community groups, have risen to prominence recently. This paper seeks to examine how internal organisational factors affect the agenda of corporate‐community partnerships. Design/methodology/approach - The internal factors considered in this research were the processes involved in the partnerships' agenda development and the attitudes of participating members towards the partnership and its social or environmental goals. Interviews were conducted with representatives from both the corporate and community members of two major partnerships in Australia. Findings - The findings suggest that internal organisational processes and attitudes affect five major features of the partnerships' agenda: form, target, scope, stability and sustainability. Research limitations/implications - The study proposes a framework for understanding how internal organizational factors affect the various features of agenda formation in corporate‐community partnerships. Practical implications - This research provides a practical understanding of corporate‐community partnerships in relation to the influences on agenda formation, and would be useful to both corporations and stakeholders, especially community groups. Social implications - This study stresses the increasing importance of corporate‐community partnerships and suggests that government policies should encourage the development of such partnerships. Originality/value - The paper examines the influences on the agenda formation of corporate‐community partnerships through the voices of corporations and community groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Glennie & Sumit Lodhia, 2013. "The influence of internal organisational factors on corporate‐community partnership agendas," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 52-67, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:medarp:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:52-67
    DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-07-2012-0022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2012-0022/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2012-0022/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2012-0022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ries Breijer & René P. Orij, 2022. "The Comparability of Non-Financial Information: An Exploration of the Impact of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD, 2014/95/EU)," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 332-361, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:medarp:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:52-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.