IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/medarp/medar-12-2019-0660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The diffusion and adoption of integrated reporting: a cross-country analysis on the determinants

Author

Listed:
  • Megawati Oktorina
  • Sylvia Veronica Siregar
  • Desi Adhariani
  • Aria Farah Mita

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the determinants of voluntary integrated reporting ( ) disclosure quality. Design/methodology/approach - The samples include companies from the Integrated Reporting Examples Database on the International Integrated Reporting Committee’s (IIRC) website, except South Africa and Brazil, where reporting is mandatory. The final sample includes 29 countries, with 148 companies and 592 observations for the study period 2014–2017. Content analysis is used to measure disclosure quality derived from the principles and elements published by IIRC (2013). The fraction regression probit model is used to test the proposed hypothesis. Findings - This study provides empirical evidence that competition from new entrants and country-level accounting competence encourage companies to implement the International Integrated Reporting Framework (IIRF). Signaling theory and diffusion of innovation theory can be used to explain this association. Meanwhile, product market competition of existing rivals has been found to reduce the adoption of the framework, which is consistent with the proprietary cost theory. Finally, this study finds that company reputation does not affect voluntary disclosure quality. Research limitations/implications - This study did not examine the barriers to entry to explain the effect of competition from new entrants as a possible determinant of disclosure quality. Furthermore, the inclusion of in the accounting curriculum of universities and certification bodies in certain countries has not been considered as a control variable. The results might also be limited to companies that voluntarily submitted into the Integrated Reporting Examples Database on the IIRC website. All these limitations provide ample avenues for future research. Practical implications - This research provides implications for governments and standard setters to further sharpen the competence of accountants through memberships in professional accountancy organisations or through training and seminars related to . The results also suggest that universities should include the topic of in the accounting program curriculum to increase the understanding of prospective accountants about this reporting regime. The results also show differences on the impact of competition between new entrants and existing rivals on disclosure quality. This can be used by IIRC or other standard setters to predict the . Originality/value - This study uses the diffusion of innovation theory to explain the association between country-level accounting competence and disclosure quality. Few studies have researched this association. The results show that a country’s accounting competence increases the application of the IIRF in corporate reporting. has been considered an innovation in corporate reporting and can be implemented by the company if its professional accountants have enough knowledge of this reporting framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Megawati Oktorina & Sylvia Veronica Siregar & Desi Adhariani & Aria Farah Mita, 2021. "The diffusion and adoption of integrated reporting: a cross-country analysis on the determinants," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 39-73, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:medarp:medar-12-2019-0660
    DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0660/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0660/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:medarp:medar-12-2019-0660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.