IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/02686900810875316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confucian culture and whistle‐blowing by professional accountants: an exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis Hwang
  • Blair Staley
  • Ying Te Chen
  • Jyh‐Shan Lan

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to use survey data to examine the impact of culture on current and future accounting and auditing professionals' intent to be whistle‐blowers in a Chinese cultural society. Design/methodology/approach - The paper examines intent to whistle‐blow and factors influencing whistle‐blowing, using survey data collected by the authors. Findings - It was found that a majority of respondents believe that a general sense of morality was the most important factor to encourage whistle‐blowing, with abiding by the policy of their organization as the second; it was also found thatguanxi, fear of retaliation, and fear of media coverage may discourage whistle‐blowing in a Chinese society. Research limitations/implications - The data are all from Confucian societies, which perhaps limits its usefulness elsewhere. Practical implications - The paper will help auditors, accountants, and policy makers to design policies that encourage whistle‐blowing. Originality/value - The paper uses original survey data collected by the authors, and the analysis will enable policy makers and professional accountants to anticipate and predict whistle‐blowing, a key factor in improving financial management and reporting, and possibly undermining auditor independence, audit quality, and the quality of financial reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis Hwang & Blair Staley & Ying Te Chen & Jyh‐Shan Lan, 2008. "Confucian culture and whistle‐blowing by professional accountants: an exploratory study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 504-526, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900810875316
    DOI: 10.1108/02686900810875316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900810875316/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900810875316/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/02686900810875316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900810875316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.