IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/02686900710819661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engagement quality review: insights from the academic literature

Author

Listed:
  • Arnold Schneider
  • William F. Messier

Abstract

Purpose - The objective of this research is to identify areas where audit research can assist the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in its deliberation of the auditing standard on engagement quality (EQ) review required by the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. Design/methodology/approach - The approach used in this paper is a review of the literature. Findings - The paper links academic research on EQ review to issues raised by the PCAOB. It also identifies questions for future research. Originality/value - The academic research reviewed in this paper provides important information to the PCAOB staff as it considers EQ review.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnold Schneider & William F. Messier, 2007. "Engagement quality review: insights from the academic literature," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(8), pages 823-839, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900710819661
    DOI: 10.1108/02686900710819661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900710819661/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900710819661/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/02686900710819661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditing; Audit standards;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900710819661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.