IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/majpps/02686900610639301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploratory study of the effects of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act, the SEC and United States stock exchange(s) rules on audit committee alignment

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Braiotta
  • Jian Zhou

Abstract

Purpose - To investigate the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) and the requirements of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX) on audit committee alignment. Design/methodology/approach - Using a unique set of hand collected data on audit committees for a sample of 129 firms during 1999, 2000, and 2002. This study is separated into two phases: the first phase of the study investigates the impact of the recommendations of the BRC on improving the effectiveness of audit committee on audit committee alignment; the second phase of the study investigates the impact of the SOX on audit committee alignment. Findings - For the BRC period, the results indicate that firms with audit committee alignment have larger total assets, have higher leverage and firms with audit committee alignment are more likely listed in NASDAQ. For the SOX period, the evidence suggests that firms with audit committee alignment are more likely to be associated with larger audit committee, higher directors' compensation, higher audit committee independence, and more audit committee meetings. Also audit committee alignment is more likely to occur in NASDAQ firms. The evidence also shows that firms experiencing audit committee alignment in 2002 are associated with less earnings management (EM) and less increase in EM. Research limitations/implications - This study shows that how boards of directors aligned their audit committees in response to the recommendations of the BRC and the requirements of the SOX. Practical implications - Our paper should be of interest to managers, audit committees, boards of directors, and regulators who focus on audit committees. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the auditing literature by showing how audit committees changed in response to recommendations of the BRC and the SOX. It also contributes to the literature by showing that firms experiencing audit committee alignment engage less in EM.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Braiotta & Jian Zhou, 2006. "An exploratory study of the effects of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act, the SEC and United States stock exchange(s) rules on audit committee alignment," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 166-190, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900610639301
    DOI: 10.1108/02686900610639301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900610639301/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02686900610639301/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/02686900610639301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900610639301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.