Author
Abstract
Purpose - To examine whether internal auditors' job performance and/or job satisfaction are related to differences in the personality variable locus‐of‐control (LOC) and its relation to perceived audit structure. Design/methodology/approach - A sample of 50 internal auditors drawn from six US firms completed a survey instrument used to identify respondents' degree of LOC, perceived audit structure and job satisfaction. Performance ratings were provided by participants' managers. Findings - The study finds that those internal auditors with more internal LOC tendencies appear to outperform cohorts with more external traits. Contrary to expectations, reported job satisfaction levels for internals are not significantly different from sample members with more external LOC. However, internal auditors with an apparent conflict between their LOC and their perceived level of audit structure do report significantly lower levels of job satisfaction than cohorts without such conflict. Research limitations/implications - The relatively small sample size may reduce the power of some of the tests performed. Future studies might want to also attempt to control for other personality or task‐related attributes. Practical implications - Results suggest that an understanding of audit structure and its relation to LOC may aid audit departments (and firms) looking to increase performance and/or retention of their staff. Originality/value - This study expands LOC/structure research both by extending the examination to the internal audit environment and by investigating the impacts on job satisfaction as well as performance.
Suggested Citation
Dennis M. Patten, 2005.
"An analysis of the impact of locus‐of‐control on internal auditor job performance and satisfaction,"
Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(9), pages 1016-1029, December.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900510625343
DOI: 10.1108/02686900510625343
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:majpps:02686900510625343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.