IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jpifpp/v30y2012i4p375-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calendar anomalies in REITs: international evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed S. Khaled
  • Stephen P. Keef

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine the relative magnitude of calendar anomalies in international Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). The anomalies are the prior day effect, the Monday effect, the turn‐of‐the‐month effect and the January effect. The results are based on 14 countries. The corresponding stock index is used as the reference by which to gauge the anomalous behaviour of each REIT. Design/methodology/approach - There are two primary dimensions to the statistical design. Between‐country differences, based on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and a measure of shareholder protection, are examined using a panel model. Differences between the REITs and their stock index are examined using a repeated measures dependent variable design. Findings - The presence of the four calendar anomalies is apparent in the REITs and the stock indices. There is not sufficient evidence to show that the magnitudes of the Monday, the turn‐of‐the‐month and the January anomalies differ between REITs and stock indices. However, there is evidence that the bad day effect is stronger for REITs compared to stocks. Research limitations/implications - In terms of market development, the sample of countries is unavoidably constrained. The sample represents developed economies. The degree that these results pertain to less developed economies has yet to be established. Originality/value - Existing research into the influence of calendar anomalies on REITs is based on US data. This paper examines the influence in 14 countries, including the USA, using a robust and efficient statistical design.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed S. Khaled & Stephen P. Keef, 2012. "Calendar anomalies in REITs: international evidence," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 375-388, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:30:y:2012:i:4:p:375-388
    DOI: 10.1108/14635781211241770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635781211241770/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14635781211241770/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/14635781211241770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harshita & Shveta Singh & Surendra S. Yadav, 2019. "Unique Calendar Effects in the Indian Stock Market: Evidence and Explanations," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 18(1_suppl), pages 35-58, April.
    2. Mehmet Akbulut & Su Han Chan & Mariya Letdin, 2015. "Calendar Anomalies: Do REITs Behave Like Stocks?," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 18(2), pages 177-215.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jpifpp:v:30:y:2012:i:4:p:375-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.