IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jopppp/jopp-09-2025-0108.html

Assessing green procurement practices in Nepal’s construction sector: challenges, perceptions, and pathways for adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Subash Kumar Bhattarai
  • Pratima Tamrakar

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the status of green procurement (GP) practices in Nepal’s construction sector, identify stakeholder perceptions and barriers to its adoption and propose actionable recommendations to promote sustainable procurement aligned with Nepal’s environmental and developmental goals.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods approach was used, combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaire surveys and key informant interviews (KIIs) with 62 stakeholders, including architects, engineers, contractors and procurement officials in Kathmandu Valley. Secondary data were sourced from literature and project documentation. Analytical methods included Bloom’s Cutoff, principal component analysis (PCA) and relative importance index (RII) to assess awareness, challenges and recommendations. Cronbach’s alpha (0.877) ensured data reliability, while Spearman’s rank correlation (ρ ≈ 0.393) evaluated differences in public and private sector perceptions.FindingsGP in Nepal’s construction sector is in its early stages, with limited adoption (24% consistent application in public projects) driven primarily by donor-funded initiatives. Stakeholder awareness is moderate (59.7%), but understanding of benefits is low (38.7% below 60% awareness). PCA identified three key barriers: institutional and organizational limitations (e.g. weak management support), knowledge and resource gaps (e.g. low awareness, high perceived costs) and policy and governance issues (e.g. political interference). RII rankings prioritized training (0.826), clear guidelines (0.816) and compliance monitoring (0.810) as critical solutions. Public and private sectors show moderate alignment in priorities, with differences in emphasis on monitoring and environmental criteria.Social implicationsPromoting GP can enhance environmental sustainability, reduce resource depletion and align Nepal’s construction sector with global sustainability goals (e.g. sustainable development goal 12.7). By fostering eco-friendly practices, it supports healthier living environments and economic benefits through long-term cost savings, contributing to Nepal’s climate resilience and sustainable development objectives.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study represents one of the first comprehensive academic investigations into GP practices within Nepal’s construction sector, making a significant contribution by establishing an empirical baseline for a previously underexplored area. It fills a significant knowledge gap by providing a baseline for GP adoption, offering stakeholder-driven insights and proposing tailored recommendations. The findings serve as a foundation for policy reforms and future research on sustainable procurement in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Subash Kumar Bhattarai & Pratima Tamrakar, 2026. "Assessing green procurement practices in Nepal’s construction sector: challenges, perceptions, and pathways for adoption," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4), pages 684-713, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-09-2025-0108
    DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-09-2025-0108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/jopp/article/26/4/684/1356262/Assessing-green-procurement-practices-in-Nepal-s
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/jopp/article-pdf/26/4/684/11480309/jopp-09-2025-0108en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JOPP-09-2025-0108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-09-2025-0108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.