IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jopppp/jopp-06-2025-0066.html

A systematic review of the critical barriers to green public procurement ( GPP ) performance evaluation for public sector institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Renas Ayebono Atanga
  • Joshua Ayarkwa
  • Dickson Osei-Asibey
  • Ivy Maame Adwoa Maame Abu
  • Benjamin Baah
  • Afua Ampofowaa Ennin

Abstract

PurposeDespite the growing emphasis on green public procurement (GPP), public institutions face challenges in attaining the desired levels of GPP performance. This study aims to identify the critical barriers to GPP performance evaluation by synthesising findings from existing literature, establish the interrelationship between the barriers and to propose strategies for addressing them.Design/methodology/approachThis study was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol. Forty papers were selected from Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), ScienceDirect and Google Scholar.FindingsLack of knowledge, lack of awareness, resistance to change, budget constraints, high costs and inadequate regulations were identified as some critical barriers to GPP performance evaluation. There is a need to build stakeholders’ capacity. Government institutions must consistently monitor to ensure public institutions comply with GPP, using performance evaluations. Institutions should support and seek innovative revenue sources to fund GPP performance evaluation activities, rather than relying solely on government support.Research limitations/implicationsThis study lacks empirical evidence to support its findings. It also focuses on public institutions, making the findings applicable to specific sectors.Practical implicationsPublic institutions can adapt methods and tools that encourage and facilitate the practice of GPP performance evaluation. Management of public institutions needs to introduce innovative training programmes to equip procurement practitioners and other stakeholders with the benefits of GPP performance evaluation, thereby enhancing their knowledge base. Management should develop internal policies and standards for GPP performance evaluations while procurement practitioners implement regular monitoring and audits.Social implicationsThis study emphasises the importance of training stakeholders on the barriers to GPP performance evaluation, empowering them to ensure that institutions conduct their activities in a way that does not harm their health or the environment.Originality/valueThis paper identifies the critical barriers to GPP performance evaluation, establishes their interrelationship and proposes strategies for addressing these barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Renas Ayebono Atanga & Joshua Ayarkwa & Dickson Osei-Asibey & Ivy Maame Adwoa Maame Abu & Benjamin Baah & Afua Ampofowaa Ennin, 2026. "A systematic review of the critical barriers to green public procurement ( GPP ) performance evaluation for public sector institutions," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4), pages 552-589, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-06-2025-0066
    DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-06-2025-0066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/jopp/article/26/4/552/1346961/A-systematic-review-of-the-critical-barriers-to
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/jopp/article-pdf/26/4/552/11313027/jopp-06-2025-0066en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JOPP-06-2025-0066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-06-2025-0066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.