Author
Listed:
- Arif Nugrahanto
- Nugroho Yonimurwanto
- Abdul Ghofar
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate how temporal configurations – specifically lead time and closing days – determine success rates and price premiums in mandatory public asset sales.Design/methodology/approachAnalysing 81,470 Indonesian transactions (2022 to 2023), the study employs binary logistic and Ordinary Least Squares regressions to isolate temporal effects on auction outcomes, controlling for asset and bidder heterogeneity.FindingsResults reveal a “duration paradox”: longer lead times generally signal adverse selection, reducing success probabilities. However, this is mitigated by two distinct mechanisms: “Monday Synergy” (demand-side), which maximizes price premiums through weekend information processing, and the “Thursday Anchor” (supply-side), where auctions exhibit procedural resilience against long lead times due to institutionalized administrative cycles. A “Digitalization Trade-off” is also confirmed, where internet auctions increase participation but reduce competitive intensity and premiums compared to conventional formats, even after accounting for asset heterogeneity.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations include the single-country context. Future research should use experimental designs to validate behavioural mechanisms and cross-country institutional applicability.Practical implicationsThe study advocates a “Bimodal Scheduling Framework”: Monday closings for revenue maximization and Thursday closings for administrative resilience. Managers must also balance digital access with competitive arousal.Social implicationsEfficient sales bolster fiscal sustainability and state revenue (PNBP) without tax hikes. Evidence-based scheduling increases transparency and public trust in government resource management.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to treat scheduling as an integrated strategic variable synchronizing market psychology with bureaucratic capacity. It introduces the “duration paradox”, “Monday Synergy” and “Thursday Anchor”, providing a framework for effective public asset disposal.
Suggested Citation
Arif Nugrahanto & Nugroho Yonimurwanto & Abdul Ghofar, 2026.
"The duration paradox and Monday Synergy: navigating the trade-offs between liquidity and value extraction in public auctions,"
Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4), pages 529-551, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-01-2026-0001
DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-01-2026-0001
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jopppp:jopp-01-2026-0001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.