Author
Listed:
- Yuliana Naidon
- Serhii Naumiuk
- Kyrylo Horyslavskiy
- Oleh Peliukh
- Roman Chernysh
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to analyse how, in 2018–2025, Ukrainian civil and commercial courts have been used to detect and neutralise sanctions circumvention schemes that are disguised as ordinary private-law transactions in the wartime context.Design/methodology/approachThis study used doctrinal analysis of Ukrainian legislation and sanction-related court decisions (2018–2025), purposive sampling and coding by evasion/circumvention pathway, followed by triangulation against official anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) and export-control guidance and relevant EU/US policy documents.FindingsBased on seven court disputes (2018–2025), this paper identifies recurring sanctions-circumvention typologies implemented through private-law instruments (registry manipulation/beneficial-ownership concealment, asset transfers, procedural substitution, claim assignment and award-based debt collection). The courts’ reasoning consistently turns on continuity of control, temporal proximity between designation and the transaction and opacity/artificiality of the restructuring. Supreme Court practice on recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards shows heightened scrutiny where the economic beneficiary may be a sanctioned entity.Research limitations/implicationsResearch limitations include jurisdiction-specific evidence; replication in EU implementing jurisdictions is recommended.Practical implicationsPractical implications include transaction-level risk indicators for banks, corporates and investigators; policy options to align civil-law remedies with AML/CFT and export-control objectives.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is among the first studies to derive a sanctions-circumvention taxonomy for Ukraine directly from court practice and to translate that case law into a structured set of transaction-level risk indicators and policy options for aligning civil-law remedies with sanctions, AML/CFT and export-control objectives.
Suggested Citation
Yuliana Naidon & Serhii Naumiuk & Kyrylo Horyslavskiy & Oleh Peliukh & Roman Chernysh, 2026.
"Sanctions circumvention via private-law instruments: Ukrainian courts and legislative reform,"
Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(2-3), pages 111-125, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-11-2025-0205
DOI: 10.1108/JMLC-11-2025-0205
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-11-2025-0205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.