Author
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to assess whether, and under what legal, institutional and operational conditions, the transplantation framework can be integrated into Dutch banks’ AML/CFT strategies to improve terrorism financing (TF) detection, given TF’s weak-signal nature and high false-positive risk.Design/methodology/approachQualitative Dutch banking-sector case study using seven semi-structured expert interviews with AML/CFT professionals (two banks; one payment service provider) and document analysis of relevant legal, regulatory, policy and institutional materials. Interviews were recorded with consent, transcribed and thematically analysed combining deductive transplantation framework codes (push–pull dynamics; constraints) with inductive practice-based themes.FindingsIntegration is only partially feasible. Respondents described TF as low-value, licit-source activity that routine rule-based monitoring struggles to detect. Three binding conditions emerged: (1) privacy and lawful-basis uncertainty limiting profiling and cross-bank data sharing; (2) fragmented visibility across institutions and internal silos; and (3) scarce TF expertise and contested resourcing.Research limitations/implicationsSmall-N qualitative design and confidentiality constraints limit generalisability and access to granular case metrics.Practical implicationsFor banks, use the transplantation framework as an intelligence-led add-on rather than a new set of automated rules. Invest in specialist TF capability and improve information flow between departments. For policymakers, make responsible use possible by clarifying lawful bases, creating safe harbours for supervised pilots and enabling secure, governed information sharing.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, the study provides one of the first empirical tests of the transplantation framework for bank-led TF detection and specifies concrete feasibility conditions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:jmlc-02-2026-0040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.