Author
Listed:
- Musonda Simwayi
- Muhammed Haseed
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a comparative position of Financial Intelligence Units (FIU) in Zambia, Zimbabwe and Malawi and assess their role in combating money laundering. Design/methodology/approach - The study employed a multiple case study research methodology. The units in the three countries are compared using a framework based on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and Commonwealth guidelines and the Egmont Group guidelines. Findings - The study established that the three countries have made tremendous progress in the fight against money laundering. The units in the three countries have several commonalities and differences. Zimbabwe is left behind in the process of establishing an effective FIU. Malawi is on top with Zambia coming second. Research limitations/implications - Apart from the common limitations of the multiple case study methodology, the major limitation of this study was the utilization of secondary data in the case of Zimbabwe. Practical implications - The practical implication of these findings is that policy makers and FIU authorities the world over would be particularly interested in regard to strengthening their units and comparing themselves with international standards. Originality/value - By focusing on three countries the study has addressed weaknesses usually associated with single country case studies. These findings may be generalized without difficulties. It is envisaged that that research will encourage similar studies in other regions of the world.
Suggested Citation
Musonda Simwayi & Muhammed Haseed, 2012.
"The role of Financial Intelligence Units in combating money laundering,"
Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 112-134, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:13685201211194754
DOI: 10.1108/13685201211194754
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jmlcpp:13685201211194754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.