Author
Listed:
- Zayyad Abdul-Baki
- Ahmad Bukola Uthman
- Atanda Aliu Olanrewaju
- Solihu Aramide Ibrahim
Abstract
Purpose - – This paper aims to argue that the methodologies adopted by the conventional management accounting in selecting between or among two or more alternative courses of action, both in the long-term and the short-term decision making endeavours conflict with the overall objective ( falah) of Islamic enterprises. Design/methodology/approach - – The paper explores relevant literatures (including theQur'anand theHadeeth) to ascertain the objective of an Islamic enterprise and suggest an alternative approach, in making a choice among alternative courses of action, that aligns with the Islamic socio-economic objective ( falah). Findings - – The paper suggests that both in long-term and short-term decision making endeavours, cost-benefit comparison (where cost includes negative externalities) rather than discounted cashflow techniques or contribution margin should be adopted in making a final choice among alternatives to achievefalah. Research limitations/implications - – The paper has not considered other objectives that may be pursued by an organisation beside profit maximization whether short-term or long-term. Practical implications - – The paper expands the frontiers of knowledge in Islamic accounting by exposing the inadequacy of the conventional management accounting decision making methods. Originality/value - – This paper explores the Islamic perspective of the conventional management accounting which is rare among scholars of accounting.
Suggested Citation
Zayyad Abdul-Baki & Ahmad Bukola Uthman & Atanda Aliu Olanrewaju & Solihu Aramide Ibrahim, 2013.
"Islamic perspective of management accounting decision making techniques,"
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(2), pages 203-219, September.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-05-2012-0031
DOI: 10.1108/JIABR-05-2012-0031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jiabrp:jiabr-05-2012-0031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.