Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin
- Mustafa Mohd Hanefah
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to examine and compare the currentwaqfgovernance practices inwaqfinstitutions in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach - This paper reviews professional documents and literature to propose a new and practicalwaqfgovernance measurement.Waqfgovernance measurements were used to examine and compare the currentwaqfgovernance practices amongwaqfinstitutions in Malaysia. The annual reports of allwaqfinstitutions under the State Islamic Religious Councils (SIRCs) were analysed using content analysis on the currentwaqfgovernance practices using binomial logic. Findings - Overall, the results indicate moderatewaqfgovernance practices under threewaqfgovernance categories, namelywaqfgovernance policy,waqfgovernance board andwaqfgovernance processes. This study also found a significant impact of corporatisation reformation ofwaqfinstitutions onwaqfgovernance practices. Research limitations/implications - The findings indicate the need for allwaqfinstitutions in Malaysia, especially for non-corporatewaqfinstitutions, to enhance theirwaqfgovernance practices by disclosing all relevant information to the public. This is because the success ofwaqffund management can be portrayed through the management’s transparency inwaqfgovernance practices on how they deliver and use their resources to attain socio-economic objectives. Originality/value - To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first studies that examined and evaluated the currentwaqfgovernance practices in several waqf institutions in Malaysia.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin & Mustafa Mohd Hanefah, 2021.
"An empirical investigation onwaqfgovernance practices inwaqfinstitutions in Malaysia,"
Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 455-473, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jfrapp:jfra-03-2020-0055
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0055
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrapp:jfra-03-2020-0055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.