Author
Listed:
- Aigul K. Kussainova
- Ainur A. Sabitova
- Shynar A. Sabitova
- Saule M. Saparaliyeva
- Yernar N. Begaliyev
Abstract
Purpose - The relevance of this research topic lies in the fact that administrative responsibility for tax offences is one of the most complex sections of legislation providing for administrative responsibility, because an administrative offence in the field of taxation is considered inextricably with the norms of tax legislation. The purpose of this study is a comparative legal and historical analysis of the legislation on administrative responsibility for offences in the field of taxation and tax legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Design/methodology/approach - The research used general scientific, private scientific and legal methods of cognition, such as analysis, synthesis, historical, formal and logical methods, as well as the comparative-legal method, which was the main method of cognition in the study. Findings - To reduce the number of administrative offences in the field of taxation, the study proposed the introduction of an open source of financial information on the income and taxes of tax collectors. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that taxation and administrative responsibility for the commission of offences in the field of taxation are studied in a simultaneous relationship with their formation and subsequent stages of development. The study examines the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the development of legislation in the field of taxation and on administrative responsibility in the field of taxation. Originality/value - This paper is devoted to the study of legal norms establishing administrative responsibility for offences in the field of taxation.
Suggested Citation
Aigul K. Kussainova & Ainur A. Sabitova & Shynar A. Sabitova & Saule M. Saparaliyeva & Yernar N. Begaliyev, 2022.
"Formation and development of taxation and legislation on administrative responsibility for tax offences in the Republic of Kazakhstan,"
Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 453-463, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jfcpps:jfc-12-2021-0268
DOI: 10.1108/JFC-12-2021-0268
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfcpps:jfc-12-2021-0268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.