Author
Listed:
- Firda Nosita
- Moeljadi Moeljadi
- Sumiati Sumiati
- Kusuma Ratnawati
- Javaid Ahmad Wagay
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to examine the impact of social networks, greed and financial literacy on individuals’ decisions to invest in Ponzi schemes in Indonesia.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative analysis was used, based on an online survey completed by 385 individuals who had potentially invested in Ponzi schemes. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling to test the proposed relationships between the variables.FindingsThe analysis revealed that all three variables: social networks, greed and financial literacy significantly influence Ponzi investment decisions. Social networks play the most prominent role by facilitating information spread through direct or indirect interpersonal connections. Greed motivates individuals to pursue high-return schemes despite known risks. Unexpectedly, higher financial literacy is positively associated with Ponzi investment participation, suggesting that financially literate individuals may be overconfident in their ability to manage risk.Practical implicationsThese findings suggest the urgent need for targeted public education and awareness campaigns. Policymakers should consider generational approaches to financial literacy that address both knowledge and behavioral biases. Preventive measures should focus not only on increasing financial knowledge but also on addressing emotional motivations and social influences.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the understanding of psychological and social factors influencing fraudulent investment decisions. It highlights the paradox that financial literacy alone may not prevent individuals from falling prey to Ponzi schemes.
Suggested Citation
Firda Nosita & Moeljadi Moeljadi & Sumiati Sumiati & Kusuma Ratnawati & Javaid Ahmad Wagay, 2026.
"The psychology of deception: exploring behavioral drivers of Ponzi investments,"
Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pages 1-19, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jfcpps:jfc-11-2025-0400
DOI: 10.1108/JFC-11-2025-0400
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfcpps:jfc-11-2025-0400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.