IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jfcpps/13590791211190713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UK Bribery Act 2010: contents and implications

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Yeoh

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assess the implications of The UK Bribery Act 2010 for businesses and in particular those with cross‐border activities. Design/methodology/approach - This study relies on documentary research and using both primary and secondary data drawn from the public domain. Findings - The study suggests why UK businesses and in particular those conducting cross‐country transactions should take the implications of this law seriously as the enforcement agency in the UK transforms to a more active mode. It also suggests why, despite some severe criticisms, the UK does not lag behind in the global fight against corruption. Research limitations/implications - This is an exploratory review paper to promote empirical research in a business sensitive theme. Practical implications - Insights from the study should prompt business leaders to give sufficient attention to those areas with high risks of falling within the ambit of the Act. Social implications - The study's findings reinforce the ethical dimensions of cross‐border business practices. Originality/value - This study uses the implications of the new UK Act to draw attention to the business community that with the passing of the Act business cannot be as usual; that compliance to the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act would be insufficient; and that despite controversies over implementation delays, the UK does not lag behind in the fight against corruption worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Yeoh, 2012. "The UK Bribery Act 2010: contents and implications," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 37-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jfcpps:13590791211190713
    DOI: 10.1108/13590791211190713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13590791211190713/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13590791211190713/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/13590791211190713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfcpps:13590791211190713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.