Author
Listed:
- Eduardo A. Haddad
- Weslem R. Faria
- Joaquim J.M. Guilhoto
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to look at the interplay of technology and social preferences in different stages of economic development. Design/methodology/approach - – The authors use a set of input-output tables for 32 different countries, published by OECD. The tables refer to the period 1996-2001 and were consolidated in 48 sectors so that structural comparisons were possible through the use of techniques of decomposition used for comparing different economic structures in the context of partitioned input-output systems. Findings - – The authors confirm that, for different levels of per capita GDP, technological change is an important element to drive growth. However, as an economy evolves, the data set also confirm that the composition of final demand, which reveals social preferences in a static way, moves away from agricultural and manufacturing to services activities. Such structural changes favor sectors with stronger value added multipliers, and stronger complexity found in higher income countries generates a force that helps driving income divergence. Research limitations/implications - – Given the chosen methodological approach, the structural features revealed in this study remain to be empirically tested in growth models. Practical implications - – The paper includes implications for the testing of growth models, suggesting there may be an association between movement into service sectors and higher growth, as modern service sectors have important spillovers on and from the manufacturing. Moreover, the way countries engage in global value changes may affect growth. Originality/value - – Using a unique data set, this paper adds to the empirical literature on economic growth that looks closer at the distinction between the role of structural change and changes in composition ode demand.
Suggested Citation
Eduardo A. Haddad & Weslem R. Faria & Joaquim J.M. Guilhoto, 2014.
"A typology of propagation of technology and social preferences in the process of economic development,"
Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 569-585, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jespps:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:569-585
DOI: 10.1108/JES-08-2012-0108
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jespps:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:569-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.