Author
Abstract
Purpose - – Is globalization instrumental in fighting corruption? Do wealth effects matter in this fight? Are findings valid when linearity assumptions are dropped? The purpose of this paper is to assess the Lalountaset al.(2011) hypotheses (conclusions) in the African context. Design/methodology/approach - – Though not form, yet in substance the intuition and motivation are compatible with those of Lalountaset al.(2011). Four hypotheses are tested from different methodological and contextual standpoints. In the analysis, while the economic and social dimensions of globalization are reflected in the human development index, the political dimension is captured by good governance indicators. A two-stage least squares-instrumental variable (TSLS-IV) estimation technique is applied where-in globalization instruments of trade and financial liberalization are instrumented on human development and government quality to account for corruption (corruption-control) effects. Thus the intuition is assessing how globalization is instrumental in the fight against corruption through human development (economic and social dimensions) and government quality (political dimension). Findings - –H1: globalization is a powerful tool in fighting corruption (True).H2: globalization is an important tool in fighting corruption only in middle- and high-income countries (partially true).H3: for low-income countries globalization has no significant impact on corruption (true).H4:H1andH2are valid only under linearity (false). Social implications - – In countries with high levels of per capita, emphasis is placed on the political and social dimensions of globalization and as a result the effects of this phenomenon on corruption-control are significant. Conversely, in nations with low levels of per capita income, emphasis is given to the economic dimension of international integration and as a result the effect of globalization on corruption is limited. As a policy implication, persistent globalization as an effective means to reduce corruption in developing countries might lead to inappropriate policies in low-income countries. Originality/value - – This paper has tested the Lalountaset al.(2011) hypotheses in the continent where concerns of globalization, human development and corruption are most acute.
Suggested Citation
Simplice Asongu, 2014.
"Globalization (fighting), corruption and development,"
Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(3), pages 346-369, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jespps:v:41:y:2014:i:3:p:346-369
DOI: 10.1108/JES-04-2012-0048
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jespps:v:41:y:2014:i:3:p:346-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.