IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jespps/v40y2013i5p600-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What determines individuals' preferences for efficiency over equity-based wages?

Author

Listed:
  • Prosper F. Bangwayo-Skeete
  • Afaf H. Rahim
  • Precious Zikhali

Abstract

Purpose - – The paper aims to examine factors that influence individuals' preferences between wages indexed on job performance or efficiency over equity-based wages. Design/methodology/approach - – Generalized linear latent and mixed models (GLLAMM) are estimated on the 2005 wave of the World Values Survey on employed individuals from 43 countries. Findings - – Results suggest that employees' preference for efficiency-based wages increases with education and globalization, while it decreases with unemployment rates. Research limitations/implications - – Institutions and specifically public policies that promote education, and globalization, along with policies that reduce unemployment rates could be used to promote wage setting policies that reward performance or efficiency. Originality/value - – The originality of the study lies in its use of both individual- and country-level data to estimate GLLAMM that take into account the multi-level nature of the dataset. This study can inform firms and policymakers on what measures to adopt to promote preferences for efficiency-based wages among individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Prosper F. Bangwayo-Skeete & Afaf H. Rahim & Precious Zikhali, 2013. "What determines individuals' preferences for efficiency over equity-based wages?," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 600-613, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jespps:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:600-613
    DOI: 10.1108/JES-10-2011-0126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JES-10-2011-0126/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JES-10-2011-0126/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JES-10-2011-0126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jespps:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:600-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.