Author
Abstract
PurposeThis paper reviews the application of game theory in finance, focusing on its role in modeling strategic interactions among market participants. It synthesizes classical models such as Nash equilibrium and signaling games while integrating emerging themes including behavioral finance, sustainability-linked decisions, decentralized finance (DeFi) and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven agents. The study aims to highlight how game-theoretic frameworks inform financial decision-making, market design and governance and to identify conceptual gaps and future research directions.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, complemented by bibliometric mapping using VOSviewer. It analyzes 78 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025 across five finance domains: asset pricing, corporate finance, investment strategies, financial markets and behavioral finance. Conceptual frameworks and taxonomies are developed to categorize game-theoretic models by strategic orientation and information structure, offering a structured synthesis of theoretical advancements and practical applications.FindingsGame theory enhances understanding of strategic behavior in finance, particularly under conditions of asymmetric information and market complexity. Key findings include the relevance of signaling games in initial public offerings pricing, repeated games in environmental, social and governance commitments and mechanism design in DeFi governance. The review identifies gaps in behavioral integration, empirical validation and modeling of decentralized ecosystems. It proposes future research directions involving multi-agent learning, adaptive mechanism design and sustainability-linked financial strategies.Research limitations/implicationsThe review is limited by its focus on published literature and may exclude emerging models in unpublished or proprietary research. Empirical validation of proposed frameworks remains a future research priority.Practical implicationsThe paper offers actionable insights for regulators, investors and policymakers by applying game-theoretic tools to systemic risk management, portfolio allocation and financial regulation in digitized markets.Originality/valueThis study provides a novel synthesis of game theory’s evolution in finance, introducing conceptual frameworks that integrate behavioral, technological and sustainability-linked dimensions.
Suggested Citation
Oluseun Paseda, 2025.
"Game theory applications in finance: a review of literature,"
Journal of Capital Markets Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 106-131, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jcmspp:jcms-04-2025-0044
DOI: 10.1108/JCMS-04-2025-0044
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jcmspp:jcms-04-2025-0044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.