Author
Listed:
- Satinder Kaur
- Sidharath Seth
- Jaspal Singh
- Prabhdeep Kaur
Abstract
PurposeThe study assessed the value relevance of residual income (RI) model of Li and Mohanram (2014) in terms of bias and accuracy in Indian stock market. In addition, it examined whether value-to-price (V/P), which operationalises intrinsic value (V) using cross-sectional earnings projections, can account for the distribution of contemporaneous stock returns.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs asset pricing regression to analyse the excess risk-adjusted returns and a panel regression model (fixed estimates) to estimate the earnings for a cross-section of Bombay Stock Exchange listed equities from 2003 to 2020. In addition, the robustness is evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulation.FindingsThe results demonstrate that the RI model provides accurate forecasts for periods ranging from one to three years. Earnings are found to be highly persistent, whereas book value and accruals have little value significance for Indian investors. The highest V/P quintile portfolio is found to be capable of generating substantial four-factor alpha, and its performance is consistent throughout the study period including market downturns.Practical implicationsThe study lends credence to the notion that investors can reliably determine a company’s true value using only publicly available information. Market participants and experts can also benefit from the findings by effectively incorporating the V/P measure into their portfolio allocation.Originality/valueTo the best of our knowledge, this study is a first attempt to compute intrinsic value estimates for a large set of Indian companies using a cross-sectional model. In addition, this study provides out-of-sample evidence to validate strategy’s success in an emerging market context.
Suggested Citation
Satinder Kaur & Sidharath Seth & Jaspal Singh & Prabhdeep Kaur, 2025.
"Value relevance of cross-sectional earnings forecast model and the expected returns,"
Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 779-796, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jaeepp:jaee-09-2023-0293
DOI: 10.1108/JAEE-09-2023-0293
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaeepp:jaee-09-2023-0293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.