IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaeepp/jaee-05-2024-0195.html

Revising the King Code: does it matter for board diversity and corporate performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Terblanche
  • Gretha Steenkamp
  • Mareli Dippenaar
  • Teerooven Soobaroyen

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates whether heightened emphasis on board diversity in the 2016 revision to the Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa (King IV) led to changes in individual dimensions and a composite measure of board diversity, and whether these changes were associated with improved financial and sustainability performance.Design/methodology/approachWe analyse 111 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange before and after the implementation of King IV. Gender, race, age and occupation diversity data were collected from company reports, while financial and sustainability performance data were collected from the IRESS database and LSEG Workspace. Drawing on resource dependence arguments, we investigate the relationship between board diversity and corporate performance.FindingsGender and racial diversity increased after the implementation of King IV. Before King IV, board diversity was positively associated with market value (price-to-book ratio), although this association became negative once diversity expectations were codified. After King IV, board diversity was related positively to social performance but negatively to environmental performance.Research limitations/implicationsCalls for greater board diversity often prompt more explicit composition requirements in corporate governance codes. However, our mixed findings suggest that such revisions may paradoxically reduce genuine engagement, as companies and stakeholders question the value of further reforms. Moreover, South African companies may not yet have realised the benefits of diverse boards, and we argue that effective diversity initiatives should go beyond target setting towards meaningful policies that foster inclusive and high-performing boards.Originality/valueThis study provides empirical evidence following the revision of a corporate governance code by focusing on various diversity dimensions and a composite measure of board diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Terblanche & Gretha Steenkamp & Mareli Dippenaar & Teerooven Soobaroyen, 2025. "Revising the King Code: does it matter for board diversity and corporate performance?," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(3), pages 599-627, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaeepp:jaee-05-2024-0195
    DOI: 10.1108/JAEE-05-2024-0195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/jaee/article/16/3/599/1298951/Revising-the-King-Code-does-it-matter-for-board
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/jaee/article-pdf/16/3/599/10295081/jaee-05-2024-0195en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAEE-05-2024-0195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaeepp:jaee-05-2024-0195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.