Author
Listed:
- Ghassan H. Mardini
- Louise Crawford
- David M. Power
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to explore the perceptions of external auditors, preparers and users (investors and analysts) of financial statements in Jordan about this new segmental reporting standard; a decision usefulness framework underpins the research. Design/methodology/approach - – The objective of this study is to explore the perceptions of external auditors, preparers and users (investors and analysts) of financial statements in Jordan about this new segmental reporting standard; a decision usefulness framework underpins the research. Findings - – The findings reveal that a majority of interviewees found that IFRS 8 was not a problematic standard, and that the management approach of IFRS 8 was an improvement on the previous standard – International Accounting Standard (IAS) 14R – because the information produced was seen as useful to users of financial statements. Moreover, the respondents indicated that there was an improvement in the quantity and quality of segmental information under IFRS 8 in annual reports for 2009; it was more understandable, relevant, reliable and comparable than the segmental information which had previously been reported. Research limitations/implications - – No attempt was made to assess the usefulness of segmental information reported under IFRS 8 by Jordanian listed companies in their annual reports for other groups such as lenders, suppliers, customers, trade creditors and the general public (IASC, 1989). Thus, a survey about the impact of IFRS 8 on other groups may yield further insights about the decision usefulness of the new standard’s disclosures. However, Jordanians are not familiar with such research instruments and the culture within the society is relatively secretive (Piro, 1998). Practical implications - – The findings of the current research should be valuable for international accounting standard setters at the International Accounting Standards Board. It provides some indication about the impact of this new standard. Originality/value - – This research shows that segmental information reported under IFRS 8 is more useful for decision makers needs compared to segmental information that previously reported under IAS 14R. It also provides a great insight about the impact of this new segmental disclosure standard.
Suggested Citation
Ghassan H. Mardini & Louise Crawford & David M. Power, 2015.
"Perceptions of external auditors, preparers and users of financial statements about the adoption of IFRS 8,"
Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 2-27, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:16:y:2015:i:1:p:2-27
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-09-2012-0066
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Árni Claessen, 2021.
"Relevance of Level 3 fair value disclosures and IFRS 13: a case study,"
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 378-390, December.
- Khaldoon Al†Htaybat, 2018.
"IFRS Adoption in Emerging Markets: The Case of Jordan,"
Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 28-47, March.
- Mohammed Adel Elzahaby, 2023.
"Corporate narrative disclosure practices in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a systematic literature review,"
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 296-315, September.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:16:y:2015:i:1:p:2-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.