IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaarpp/jaar-02-2021-0037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is conditional conservatism a source of deviations of financial statements from Benford's Law?

Author

Listed:
  • Tri Tri Nguyen
  • Chau Minh Duong
  • Nguyet Thi Minh Nguyen

Abstract

Purpose - In this paper, the authors examine the association between conditional conservatism and deviations of the first digits of financial statement items from what are expected by Benford's Law. Design/methodology/approach - This research uses data of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. The authors measure deviations of first digits from Benford's Law following Amiramet al. (2015) and firm-year conditional conservatism following previous studies (Basu, 1997; Khan and Watts, 2009; García Laraet al., 2016). The authors use multiple regressions to provide evidence for their hypothesis. Findings - The results show that conditional conservatism is positively associated with deviations from Benford's Law. The findings are robust across different measures of deviations and conditional conservatism. Also, the authors find that the relationship between deviations from Benford's Law and conditional conservatism is more pronounced for firms with debt issuance, and for leveraged firms facing financial distress. Next, the authors’ analyses confirm previous evidence by showing that the first digits of financial statement items of UK listed companies conform to Benford's Law at the firm-specific level and the market level, and deviations of income statements are larger than those of balance sheets and cash flow statements. Research limitations/implications - The research makes significant contributions to the literature. First, this is the first study that provides empirical evidence suggesting that conditional conservatism may be a source of deviations from Benford’s Law. Second, the authors provide evidence confirming previous US findings (e.g. Amiramet al., 2015) showing that the distributions of first digits of financial statement items of UK listed companies also conform to Benford's Law. Practical implications - The authors’ findings have implications for auditors. Auditors should be aware of “false positive” for material misstatements when using Benford's Law as a risk assessment procedure. While both conditional conservatism and earnings management are related to deviations from Benford's Law, conservatism-related biases could indicate less audit risks. Originality/value - The authors provide new and original evidence suggesting that conditional conservatism is related to deviations from Benford's Law.

Suggested Citation

  • Tri Tri Nguyen & Chau Minh Duong & Nguyet Thi Minh Nguyen, 2022. "Is conditional conservatism a source of deviations of financial statements from Benford's Law?," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 1024-1046, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-02-2021-0037
    DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0037/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0037/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-02-2021-0037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.