Author
Listed:
- Ahmad Usman Shahid
- Hafiza Sobia Tufail
- Hafiz Yasir Ali
- Joane Jonathan
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to contribute to the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature by providing holistic insights into financial analysts’ personal values, perceived behavioural risk and investment decisions relating to the social aspects of CSR. Specifically, this paper examines whether analysts’ personal values, such as religiosity, spirituality and social consciousness, influence their investment decisions relating to a highly profitable firm that is alleged of exploiting labour rights. This study also examines the mediating role of analysts’ perceived behavioural risk between personal values and investment decisions. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected, using a scenario-based survey, from 145 financial analysts at both public and private companies in Pakistan. Findings - The results show that analysts’ values, including religiosity, spirituality and social consciousness, have a significant negative impact on their investment decisions. The results also demonstrate that perceived behavioural risk mediates the relationship between these values and investment decisions. Practical implications - This study has implications for the globalised business world, regulators and researchers for incorporating personal and ethical values into risk and investment decision-making. Originality/value - This study establishes the importance of analysts’ personal values in risky investment decision-making.
Suggested Citation
Ahmad Usman Shahid & Hafiza Sobia Tufail & Hafiz Yasir Ali & Joane Jonathan, 2023.
"Financial analysts’ personal values, perceived behavioural risk and investment decisions in evaluating CSR,"
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 716-733, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:imefmp:imefm-11-2021-0443
DOI: 10.1108/IMEFM-11-2021-0443
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:imefmp:imefm-11-2021-0443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.