IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijsepp/ijse-05-2015-0114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of MGNREGA: data envelopment analysis approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sarabjeet D. Natesan
  • Rahul Ratnakar Marathe

Abstract

Purpose - How can efficiency of a welfare scheme be measured? The purpose of this paper is to develop an efficiency evaluation model, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) implementation efficiency model (MIEM), to evaluate the rural employment guarantee scheme in India. Design/methodology/approach - MIEM employs data envelopment analysis (DEA) to compare relative efficiency of MGNREGA implementing states. It uses policy implementation process as a central “black-box” about which not much can be said, to account for state-wise implementation differences. Findings - Based on administration, funds, expenditure, employment created, works executed and completed, women beneficiaries and households completing 100 days of employment, the MIEM captures current implementation efficiency and provides suggestions to propel inefficient states toward efficiency. Practical implications - DEA has operationalized MGNREGA evaluation. As a decision support system, MIEM assists evaluators to develop guidelines from better performing states. It is anticipated that it will facilitate scaling up MGNREGA in inefficient states. Social implications - The model developed here can be applied to diverse evaluation conditions thus leading to better utilization of scarce resources. Originality/value - This paper is one of few to use DEA to evaluate MGNREGA, and is one of the first to evaluate all India implementing states on efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarabjeet D. Natesan & Rahul Ratnakar Marathe, 2017. "Evaluation of MGNREGA: data envelopment analysis approach," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 181-194, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:ijse-05-2015-0114
    DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-05-2015-0114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSE-05-2015-0114/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSE-05-2015-0114/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJSE-05-2015-0114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pyoungsoo Lee & Yong Won Seo, 2017. "Directions for Social Enterprise from an Efficiency Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Peixin Duan, 2022. "How large of a grant size is appropriate? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Miguel Blanco & Lydia Bares & Oksana Hrynevych & Marcos Ferasso, 2021. "Analysis of the Territorial Efficiency of European Funds as an Instrument to Reduce Labor Gender Differences," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Sarabjeet D. Natesan & Rahul R. Marathe, 2021. "MGNREGA Implementation in Tamil Nadu: Voices from the fields," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(1), pages 128-137, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:ijse-05-2015-0114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.