Author
Listed:
- Nadirah Mat Pozian
- Yvette D. Miller
- Jenni Mays
Abstract
Purpose - Evidence for the availability and utilisation of family-friendly work conditions (FFWCs) in Malaysia has not been comprehensively reviewed. Whether persistent inequities are due to poor employer provision of work conditions or low employee uptake remains unknown. This scoping review to assess the scope of available evidence for availability and utilisation of specific FFWCs among women in Malaysia, and synthesise reported findings. Design/methodology/approach - This scoping review used Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and twenty-two articles were reviewed. Findings - Flexible work hours, telecommuting/work from home, staggered work hours, childcare centres proximal to workplaces, and childcare subsidies were reported as most commonly available work conditions. Available leave varied across organisations and sectors in provision of payment and duration. Flexible work hours, leave, and childcare centres proximal to workplaces were the conditions most used by employees. However, the validity of observed availability and utilisation of work conditions in Malaysia is questionable, due to inconsistencies in the specificity and range of work conditions assessed and heterogeneity of samples. Practical implications - National monitoring of the accessibility and uptake of FFWCs is required to guide investment decisions about family-friendly policy initiatives to effectively advance gender equity in the Malaysian labour force. Originality/value - This scoping review provides the first comprehensive synthesis and summary of the availability and utilisation of FFWCs in Malaysia. Peer review - The peer review history for this article is available at:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-02-2024-0103
Suggested Citation
Nadirah Mat Pozian & Yvette D. Miller & Jenni Mays, 2024.
"Availability and utilisation of family-friendly work conditions for women in Malaysia: a review,"
International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 780-819, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijsepp:ijse-02-2024-0103
DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-02-2024-0103
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:ijse-02-2024-0103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.