IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/v57y2008i4p329-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the performance of national public sectors: conceptual problems

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Van de Walle

Abstract

Purpose - A number of studies and indicators have ranked European countries in terms of the performance of their public sectors. This paper aims to demonstrate that there are important conceptual problems with such rankings and comparisons. Design/methodology/approach - Using the existing indicators, the paper first shows how European countries' public sectors are ranked. It then goes on to show how conceptual problems with these indicators may lead to incorrect conclusions. Findings - Countries' public sector performance cannot be summarised using a single indicator because of inability to define “the public sector” and the disagreement on what it means for public sectors to perform. Practical implications - Despite increasing demand and supply in policy circles for international public sector indicators, the existing ones are unreliable. Originality/value - This paper extends the assessment of international public sector indicators beyond a mere technical evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Van de Walle, 2008. "Comparing the performance of national public sectors: conceptual problems," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 329-338, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:57:y:2008:i:4:p:329-338
    DOI: 10.1108/17410400810867535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17410400810867535/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17410400810867535/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17410400810867535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karo , Erkki & Kattel , Rainer, 2015. "Innovation Bureaucracy: Does the organization of government matter when promoting innovation?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/38, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Shahram Ali Kazho & Tarik Atan, 2022. "Public Sector Downsizing and Public Sector Performance: Findings from a Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Lavinia Mustea, 2022. "An Overview of Public Sector Performance in Europe," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 339-345, September.
    4. Onofrei, Mihaela & Lupu, Dan, 2010. "The dimension of public administration in Central and Eastern European countries in the current financial crisis," MPRA Paper 95513, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Nduhura, Dominique & Prieler, Michael, 2017. "When I chat online, I feel relaxed and work better: Exploring the use of social media in the public sector workplace in Rwanda," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 708-716.
    6. Kjurchiski, Nikola, "undated". "Public Administration Efficiency in Resource Economies," Published Papers nvg128, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    7. Sobis Iwona & Okouma Offolome Guepie Victorien, 2017. "Performance Management: How the Swedish Administration of Transportation for the Disabled Succeeded. A Case Study of Transportation Service for the Disabled, the Municipality of Gothenburg," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 141-175, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:v:57:y:2008:i:4:p:329-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.