Author
Listed:
- Aline Patricia Mano
- Sergio E. Gouvea da Costa
- Edson Pinheiro de Lima
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study seeks to identify the critical barriers for the deployment of Lean Construction (LC). Design/methodology/approach - In order to identify the barriers of Lean Construction, a systematic review of the scientific literature was carried out, in addition to analysis of the content of papers presented at a major Lean Construction conference. After the barriers were identified, a Lawshe study was conducted with experts in Lean Construction to verify the criticality of each of the barriers encountered. Findings - This study identified 83 potential pre-deployment barriers in the literature, of which eight were considered critical by the experts. The results of Lawshe study pointed that critical barriers refer to leadership characteristics, cultural aspects and structural aspects. Research limitations/implications - Variations in the assessment of the criticality of the barriers may occur from one country to another due to regional differences in the construction sector. Practical implications - The implications of this study are recognizing and identifying the characteristics of an organization that can hinder Lean Construction allows these issues to be resolved before beginning the Lean journey. Originality/value - This article is the first of its kind to assess the criticality of barriers to Lean Construction using a quantitative technique. Knowledge of this set of barriers provides both practical and theoretical readers with an increased chance of success in the deployment of an LC project.
Suggested Citation
Aline Patricia Mano & Sergio E. Gouvea da Costa & Edson Pinheiro de Lima, 2020.
"Criticality assessment of the barriers to Lean Construction,"
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(1), pages 65-86, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-11-2018-0413
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-11-2018-0413
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-11-2018-0413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.