IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijppmp/ijppm-11-2016-0243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why does performance management not perform?

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Pina e Cunha
  • Daniel Veiga Vieira
  • Arménio Rego
  • Stewart Clegg

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to ask why poor performance management practices persist in Portugal, in the middle of claims to increase productivity. Design/methodology/approach - An inductive micro-practice analysis is used to understand barriers to management practice that do not require massive institutional changes. Findings - The practice of performance management in Portugal typically displays three weaknesses: (1) insufficient planning (2) process and integrity issues, and (3) a non-meritocratic logic. Research limitations/implications - The paper discusses the important topic of persistence of bad practices, showing how institutionalized patterns might be difficult to eradicate even they are suboptimal. Practical implications - The authors identity key issues in the functioning of performance management, therefore helping managers in developing remedies to improve the quality of their practice. Originality/value - The paper explains the persistence of bad management practice whose continuity hinders not only organizations’ effectiveness but also that of their members.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Pina e Cunha & Daniel Veiga Vieira & Arménio Rego & Stewart Clegg, 2018. "Why does performance management not perform?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(4), pages 673-692, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-11-2016-0243
    DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-11-2016-0243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2016-0243/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2016-0243/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2016-0243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-11-2016-0243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.