Author
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the utility-level productivity changes in Indian electricity sector during a period that witnessed structural reforms through several landmark regulatory changes. Design/methodology/approach - A transformed fixed-effect stochastic frontier panel approach accounting for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity is employed to evaluate the productivity changes, and the inefficiency level in 98 utilities spanning over the years 2001–2010. A flexible translog production model is modeled and estimated, and decomposition of productivity into components of changes in efficiency, scale technology and price effect is computed. Findings - The empirical findings obtained from the present study suggest that the utility-level productivity in Indian electricity sector has generally declined during the observed period of 2001–2010 specifically after the implementation of Electricity Act 2003. Also, it is estimated that the state-level un-bundling of the electricity sector is not significantly associated with utility-level efficiency change. Furthermore, efficiency improvements attributable to increased competition are observed only in the case of smaller gas-based generating utilities. Originality/value - Earlier studies on the productivity evaluation of Indian electricity industry have applied the non-parametric data envelopment analysis approach, which has several limitations. The novelty of the paper lies in the fact that this paper is one of the first attempts that implement transformed fixed-effect stochastic frontier panel approach and thus disentangle unobserved heterogeneity from inefficiency. Furthermore, it is the only paper that analyzes 98 utilities (51 generating utilities, 38 transmission and distribution licensees and 9 vertically integrated utilities) in a single framework during the period 2001–2010.
Suggested Citation
Pavan Khetrapal, 2018.
"A transformed fixed effect stochastic frontier approach for productivity evaluation in Indian electricity sector,"
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(9), pages 1657-1681, November.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-08-2017-0197
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2017-0197
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:ijppm-08-2017-0197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.