Author
Listed:
- Chew Har Loke
- Suhaiza Ismail
- A.H. Fatima
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to empirically testArnaud’s (2010)ethical climate index (ECI) of measuring ethical work climate (EWC) in the context of Malaysian public sector auditors (PSAs). Design/methodology/approach - EWC is conceptualized as four main components with two sub-components. Questionnaires were distributed to the population of PSAs in the Malaysian National Audit Department (NAD). Factor analysis (principal component analysis [PCA]) was used to verify the components of EWC. Findings - Results from PCA revealed that EWC, indeed, has four main components. Therefore, the findings of this study provide empirical evidence that validatesArnaud’s (2010)EWC model, although tested on PSAs in Malaysia. Research limitations/implications - This paper has a limited purpose, which is to test whether the ECI could be applied to PSAs in Malaysia to derive the original four main components of Arnaud’s EWC. Thus, this study does not evaluate the EWC of PSAs or determine causal relationships between EWC and other variables; these are left to future studies. Practical implications - The findings of this study confirm thatArnaud’s (2010)ECI is sufficiently resilient to be applied to the context of PSAs in Malaysia. Hence, future studies could use this index to measure EWC not only in the public sector but also in the private sector. Future research could also further test this index in different contexts. Originality/value - Arnaud’s (2010)ECI was originally applied in the context of the private sector in a developed country. Hence, this study adds value by extending the ECI to the public sector in a developing country, Malaysia.
Suggested Citation
Chew Har Loke & Suhaiza Ismail & A.H. Fatima, 2019.
"Validation of Arnaud’s ethical climate index by public sector auditors in Malaysia,"
International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 345-358, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijoesp:ijoes-12-2018-0183
DOI: 10.1108/IJOES-12-2018-0183
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijoesp:ijoes-12-2018-0183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.