Author
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to find out the similarities and differences in meaning between the word “al amanah” and trust. Design/methodology/approach - As a qualitative research, a content analysis is used in three stages. First, to elaborate the exegesis of the related Qur’anic verses together with the background narration orasbab un-nuzulif any and the Prophetic hadith where the word amanah is and to analyse and conclude its meanings. Second, the word “trust” is analysed based on the discussions in the literature which will lead to its specific meanings. Third, the concluded meanings ofamanahand trust are to be compared to find out their similarities and differences. Findings - Amanahand trust have the similar meanings: safe, confident, ability to fulfil the expectation of the person who trust, having competence or expertise to perform duty, deliver commitments, keep promises, work with a full of responsibility, integrity or obedient to moral principles. Differences:Amanahis not only oriented to humanity and responsibility in human’s relations but also, more importantly, to GodAllahthe Almighty, obeying His commands to make it asibadahor acts of worshippingAllahthe Almighty formaslahahor welfare for society. Practical implications - The findings are considered important for companies or organisations. Before doing a commercial transaction or entering a contract or hiring an employee, they must study the quality of the counterparty whether they are capable to do the job as expected or not. In addition, the findings indicate that Islamic teachings concerningmuamalator Islamic rules for social dealings is universal in nature. Originality/value - Being the first time to compare the word alamanahto trust, the findings point out the important elements to be evaluated when assigning a certain duty to an agent.
Suggested Citation
Hendy Herijanto, 2022.
"Al amanah in al qur’an vs trust: a comparative study,"
International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 549-575, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijoesp:ijoes-03-2021-0064
DOI: 10.1108/IJOES-03-2021-0064
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijoesp:ijoes-03-2021-0064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.