IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijoemp/17468801111144067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of the attitudes toward women managers in China, Chile, and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Rajshekhar (Raj) G. Javalgi
  • Robert Scherer
  • Carol Sánchez
  • Lorena Pradenas Rojas
  • Víctor Parada Daza
  • Chi‐en Hwang
  • Wu Yan

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this research is to determine if stereotypical perceptions of women as managers exist between men and women in three countries: the USA, China, and Chile. Based on the extant literature, hypotheses were developed and tested. Design/methodology/approach - Participants in the study were students enrolled in degree programs. The data were collected from the USA, China, and Chile using the “Women as Managers Scale”. The study explores attitudinal dimensions. Further, gender and country effects were identified at both multivariate and univariate levels. Findings - The findings show that stereotypical perceptions of women as managers exist between men and women in the USA, China, and Chile. US and Chilean men had more positive perceptions of women as managers than Chinese men. Chinese men and women displayed the lowest perceptions of women as managers. Originality/value - The results of this study offer useful insights for international managers on the perceptions of women as managers in three distinct countries. Implications for research and practice in international management shed additional light on this important topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajshekhar (Raj) G. Javalgi & Robert Scherer & Carol Sánchez & Lorena Pradenas Rojas & Víctor Parada Daza & Chi‐en Hwang & Wu Yan, 2011. "A comparative analysis of the attitudes toward women managers in China, Chile, and the USA," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 233-253, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijoemp:17468801111144067
    DOI: 10.1108/17468801111144067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17468801111144067/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17468801111144067/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17468801111144067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijoemp:17468801111144067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.