IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijmfpp/v5y2009i3p333-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lucent Technologies, Inc.: using structural models to value debt (and equity)

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Camiolo
  • Salvatore Cantale
  • Michael Purcell

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show how contingent claim valuation and, more precisely, structural models, can be used to value the debt and the equity of a corporation. The objective is to provide a general and unified valuation framework. Design/methodology/approach - A discrete version of the Geske model in a binomial-like environment is implemented. To make the analysis more applied, real data of a corporation – Lucent Technologies, Inc. are used – and the valuation is attempted. Findings - Structural models can be used as a practical valuation tool. The results that are obtained are close to market data. Additionally, the authors are able to determine the price of some non-traded claims (debt). Research limitations/implications - While the more direct implication is that structural models can be used as a practical valuation tool, more applied research is needed to better calibrate the models. Originality/value - To the applied finance literature is contributed by presenting a way of estimating the value of corporate debt and equity by calibrating a discrete version of Geske model. It is believed that this approach is not only interesting from the academic point of view, but can also serve as a useful tool for practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Camiolo & Salvatore Cantale & Michael Purcell, 2009. "Lucent Technologies, Inc.: using structural models to value debt (and equity)," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(3), pages 333-354, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:5:y:2009:i:3:p:333-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/17439130910969747?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:5:y:2009:i:3:p:333-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: http://www.emeraldinsight.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.