IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijmfpp/v3y2007i3p306-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of the Australian Stock Exchange andAustralian Financial Review's fair values

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Easton
  • Irena Ivanovic

Abstract

Purpose - The paper seeks to examine fair values provided by the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and reported daily in theAustralian Financial Reviewto determine whether they violate fundamental option relationships. Design/methodology/approach - Values reported in theAustralian Financial Reviewfrom 4 January 2005 to 31 March 2005 are examined. Findings - The results document that between 1 and 2 per cent violate the most fundamental option relationships, specifically the requirement for call and put option values to increase as term to expiry increases, and for call (put) option values to increase (decrease) as exercise price decreases. Further, the magnitude of these violations is too large to be explained solely by the bid‐ask spread. They are, nevertheless, consistent with staleness. Further, in nearly 30 per cent of cases these fair values violate the basic put‐call parity relationship. The type of these violations is also consistent with these values being stale. Research limitations/implications - Simple screens should be included to remove fair values that breach the most basic relationships. Originality/value - The paper is the first to highlight flaws in fair values provided by the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and reported in theAustralian Financial Review.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Easton & Irena Ivanovic, 2007. "An examination of the Australian Stock Exchange andAustralian Financial Review's fair values," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(3), pages 306-312, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:3:y:2007:i:3:p:306-312
    DOI: 10.1108/17439130710756934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17439130710756934/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17439130710756934/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17439130710756934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:3:y:2007:i:3:p:306-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.