IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a new consensus: poverty reduction strategies for Bolivia


  • Jorge Buzaglo
  • Alvaro Calzadilla


Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the viability for Bolivia of attaining the United Nations millennium development goal established in year 2000, of halving extreme poverty by 2015. Design/methodology/approach - The study is based in numerical simulation with a model of the Bolivian economy. The model pertains to the (widely defined) family of dynamic input-output models, and represents in detail income distribution, by size and socioeconomic class. Findings - The millennium development goal of halving extreme poverty by 2015 seems to be a difficult, but attainable goal for Bolivia. Given the expected debt reduction agreed with international creditors, the goal can be attained by a combination of investment and redistribution policies. Research limitations/implications - It is implied that a new approach to development strategy is adopted. A new policy consensus is assumed to supplant the Washington Consensus. The new consensus model is based on objectives such as policy autonomy, structural change, and distributive justice. Poverty reduction strategy is a combination of policies associated with these objectives, viz. foreign debt policy, investment policy, and income distribution policy. Practical implications - The study shows that capital account regulation, investment planning and redistributive policies might conform effective strategies for attaining the millennium development goals. Originality/value - The study represents a different approach to poverty reduction strategy, which explores the economy-wide effects of new policy instruments, particularly on growth capacity, output structure, and income distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Buzaglo & Alvaro Calzadilla, 2009. "Towards a new consensus: poverty reduction strategies for Bolivia," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 18-39, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijdipp:v:8:y:2009:i:1:p:18-39

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijdipp:v:8:y:2009:i:1:p:18-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.