Author
Listed:
- Yanchao Rao
- Ken Guo
- Jing Hou
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which Chinese firms voluntarily extend the standard XBRL taxonomy to disclose more detailed financial information; and second, to identify and test corporate governance factors that may be associated with voluntary taxonomy extensions in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)‐based reporting. Design/methodology/approach - Using a sample of 114 firms that are listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchanges, the authors compared their XBRL‐based financial reports of 2008 and 2009 with the standard XBRL taxonomy. Multiple regression tests were performed to examine the effects of corporate governance factors and firm characteristics on XBRL taxonomy extensions. Findings - The results indicate a high level of voluntary taxonomy extension in Chinese firms' XBRL reports. The extent of such extension is associated with the percentage of independent directors, combined CEO/chair of the board position, and firm size. It is also associated with audit firm size, in that companies audited by Big Four firms tend to have lower level of taxonomy extension. However, the direction of the result is opposite to what the authors expected. Research limitations/implications - This paper highlights the effects of corporate governance factors on Chinese firms' decisions to extend XBRL standard taxonomy and, in doing so, to disclose more financial information. Future research may consider using longitudinal data and alternative corporate governance factors to validate and extend the results. Originality/value - It is an unanswered question as to whether and why firms extend standard XBRL taxonomies and disclose additional voluntary information. This paper fills the gap by investigating this issue in the context of the Chinese capital market.
Suggested Citation
Yanchao Rao & Ken Guo & Jing Hou, 2013.
"Who extends the extensible?,"
International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 133-147, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijaimp:v:21:y:2013:i:2:p:133-147
DOI: 10.1108/18347641311312276
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijaimp:v:21:y:2013:i:2:p:133-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.