Author
Abstract
Purpose - Auditor independence is regarded as the cornerstone in the auditing profession. But there is lack of research to examine the influence of the types of non‐audit services provisions and gift hospitality on auditor independence. This paper aims to fill this gap. Design/methodology/approach - This Hong Kong study differs significantly from prior studies and is the first to examine the perceived independence by encompassing both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Binary logistic regression is used to capture data from Big 4 auditors and financial analysts' viewpoints. Findings - Results indicate that auditor independence decreases as the auditors provide accounting services, internal audit or corporate finance services to the firms. Corporate finance services have the greatest negative impact. However, it contributes new knowledge to the literature that the provisions of taxation services to clients are value‐added service and confirms the result in the US study. Receiving gift or hospitality from client has no influence on perceived independence and revokes an early study by Pany and Reckers. There is no expectation gap found between the groups, narrowing the expectation gap theory in the post‐Enron and revokes the US and the UK studies. Practical implications - The expectation gap theory seems to be narrowed in the post‐Enron environment. It is hoped that a longitudinal study could be conducted in future. Originality/value - This paper adds new contributions to the auditing literature in the Asia Pacific Region and provides better understanding for devising auditing guidelines in Hong Kong and their international counterparts.
Suggested Citation
Philip Law, 2010.
"The influence of the types of NAS provisions and gifts hospitality on auditor independence,"
International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 105-117, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijaimp:v:18:y:2010:i:2:p:105-117
DOI: 10.1108/18347641011048101
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijaimp:v:18:y:2010:i:2:p:105-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.